Keep in mind that different designs of different lenses can produce different shapes with highlights. Many photographers rely upon macro and telephoto lenses for bokeh since they’re designed to provide such an effect. Typically, the size and shape of the field and overall effect of bokeh are achieved based on the shape of blades of wide and fast prime lenses (f/2.8, f/2, f/1.8 and f/1.4). Tools Needed to Create BokehĪn extreme depth of field that is shallow is a standard bokeh element. Of course, photographers can also make their own bokeh shapes, such as diamonds, hearts and stars, by masking off part of the lens. These shapes aren’t always uniformly fuzzy.ĭepending on the level of spherical aberration in the lens, they can possess spots within them of higher illuminated intensity and reduced haze. With purposeful bokeh, adjusting the focus away from the light source creates soft rounds or bubbles and heptagon shapes based on the lens design. In those cases, the droplets can possess a bokeh feeling by accident since they reflect light, which then makes them appear to have a similar form as lights in bokeh shots. Yet, lens flares occur when light becomes dispersed or scattered when it hits the lens.Īnother similar comparison is made with shots that involved water striking the lens. Some people actually confuse them with a lens flare, which creates a similar effect. In a bokeh image, highlights and reflections can again appear as rounded or heptagon shapes. In a bad bokeh image, hard, discordant transitions might exist in the blur or between it and the subject and textures or even colors between the two might clash. With ugly bokeh, the contrast and overall quality of the image feel wrong. Qualities of good bokeh can include smooth transitions in the blur and soft edges on highlights and light reflections, as seen with round bokeh and heptagon-shaped bokeh, and an overall soft texture. It means that when someone looks at the contrast between the subject that’s in focus and the area outside of it, they feel that the contrast or the overall look of the photo is great. Yet, there’s no doubt that “good” bokeh refers to an experience. Many photographers continue to debate not only the differences between “good” and “bad” bokeh but also if bokeh refers only to the blurred area or the entire picture. Hobbyists who love to paint can recreate great bokeh photos using a variety of paints, including acrylics, oils and watercolors. Modern artists now attempt to recreate the photographic effect of bokeh so that their paintings look like quality bokeh photos. With the creation of lampposts and eventually street and car lights, more artists utilized the effect and made these sources blurry and circular shape in paintings. They would make their foreground subjects incredibly focused and detailed and produce a hazy background that contained less detail to produce a pleasant contrast. Painters often used a similar effect on canvas and other forms of painted and drawn artwork. Bokeh merely describes the effect that has become increasingly popular in recent years with photography. Photographic images aren’t the first to contain bokeh in the history of human art. It’s important to keep in mind that good bokeh must appear smooth and produce a pleasant contrast between the blurred area and the person or object. It can also contain soft, reflected lights. The background blur can look creamy and subtle, swirly, coarse, circular, or heptagonal. The total effect varies widely depending on many factors. The area of the image that has the effect is outside of the depth of field that contains the in-focus of the image. Essentially, out-of-focus areas and background pleasantly highlight a clearly focused foreground. Out-of-Focus Blurīokeh describes a pleasing out-of-focus blur or hazy effect or quality in a photograph, typically in the background, that you can achieve by using various methods. The word, pronounced bō-kā, is derived from the Japanese word “boke” or “blur” and refers more to the aesthetic or feeling related to the effect than the actual blur quality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |